Strategy•Editorially reviewed September 5, 2026

    AI Search Content and Measurement Checklist

    This checklist is a review aid, not a scoring model or recipe for citations. Mark an item complete only when a reviewer can inspect the supporting artifact.

    Technical access

    • Priority URLs return the intended status and content.
    • Canonical and indexation directives match editorial intent.
    • Important text is visible without authentication.
    • Internal links reach priority pages.
    • Structured data validates and matches visible content.
    • Sitemaps and robots rules are reviewed for accidental conflicts.

    Facts and editorial evidence

    • Organization, product, location, people, and policy facts are consistent.
    • Consequential claims have a source, scope, owner, and review date.
    • External facts link to suitable primary sources.
    • Comparisons disclose criteria and commercial interests.
    • Examples are labeled and not presented as outcomes.
    • Stale, unsupported, or duplicate passages are removed.

    Page usefulness

    • The intended audience and question are documented.
    • A direct answer includes necessary qualifications.
    • Headings describe distinct sub-questions.
    • Limitations, prerequisites, and update dates are visible.
    • Links help readers verify or continue the task.
    • Accessibility and normal editorial review are complete.

    Observation and governance

    • Prompt selection and collection conditions are written.
    • Complete responses and displayed links are retained.
    • Counts include denominators and exclusions.
    • Inputs are not reported as assistant outcomes.
    • Release and repeat-test dates are logged.
    • Owners, privacy controls, retention, and handover are assigned.

    Limits and next step

    Not every item applies to every site. Record “not applicable” with a reason, prioritize confirmed user or technical problems, and do not convert the completed-item count into a visibility promise.

    Need a scoped evidence review?

    Discuss the questions, public pages, collection method, deliverables, and limitations before deciding whether a project is appropriate.